Its' too ugly and needs to go. The only users are core code and
parisc. Core code does not need it and parisc gets a new check once
IRQ_PER_CPU is reflected in irq_data.state.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The saving of this switch is minimal versus the ifdef mess it
creates. Simple enable PER_CPU unconditionally and remove the config
switch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
chip implementations need to know about it. Keep status in sync until
all users are fixed.
Accessor function: irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(irqdata)
Coders who access them directly will be tracked down and slapped with
stinking trouts.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Some chip implementations need to access certain status flags. With
sparse irqs that requires a lookup of the irq descriptor. Add a state
field which contains such flags.
Name it in a way which will make coders happy to access it with the
proper accessor functions. And it's easy to grep for.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We need to maintain the flag for now in both fields status and istate.
Add a CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT switch to allow testing w/o
the status one. Wrap the access to status IRQ_INPROGRESS in a inline
which can be turned of with CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT along
with the define.
There is no reason that anything outside of core looks at this. That
needs some modifications, but we'll get there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The irq_desc.status field will either go away or renamed to
settings. Anyway we need to maintain compatibility to avoid breaking
the world and some more. While moving bits into the core, I need to
avoid that I use any of the still existing IRQ_ bits in the core code
by typos. So that file will hold the inline wrappers and some nasty
CPP tricks to break the build when typoed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
That field will contain internal state information which is not going
to be exposed to anything outside the core code - except via accessor
functions. I'm tired of everyone fiddling in irq_desc.status.
core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it is clear enough, annoying to
type and easy to grep for. Offenders will be tracked down and slapped
with stinking trouts.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
All archs implement show_interrupts() in more or less the same
way. That's tons of duplicated code with different bugs with no
value. Implement a generic version and deprecate show_interrupts()
Unfortunately we need some ifdeffery for !GENERIC_HARDIRQ archs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
It's safe to drop the IRQ_INPROGRESS flag between action chain walks
as we are protected by desc->lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Core code replacement for the ugly camel case. It contains all the
code which is shared in all handlers.
clear status flags
set INPROGRESS flag
unlock
call action chain
note_interrupt
lock
clr INPROGRESS flag
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
IRQ_MASKED is set in mask_ack_irq() anyway. Remove it from
handle_edge_irq() to allow simpler ab^HHreuse of that function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.918484270@linutronix.de>
Now that everything uses the wrappers, we can remove the default
functions. None of those functions is performance critical.
That makes the IRQ_MASKED flag tracking fully consistent.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Aside of duplicated code some of the startup/shutdown sites do not
handle the MASKED/DISABLED flags and the depth field at all. Move that
to a helper function and take care of it there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.787481468@linutronix.de>
The if (chip->irq_shutdown) check will always evaluate to true, as we
fill in chip->irq_shutdown with default_shutdown in
irq_chip_set_defaults() if the chip does not provide its own function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.667607458@linutronix.de>
With the chip.end() function gone we might run into a situation where
a poll call runs and the real interrupt comes in, sees IRQ_INPROGRESS
and disables the line. That might be a perfect working one, which will
then be masked forever.
So mark them polled while the poll runs. When the real handler sees
IRQ_INPROGRESS it checks the poll flag and waits for the polling to
complete. Add the necessary amount of sanity checks to it to avoid
deadlocks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
There is no point in polling disabled lines.
percpu does not make sense at all because we only poll on the cpu
we're currently running on. Also polling per_cpu interrupts is racy as
hell. The handler runs without locking so we might get a huge
surprise.
If the timer interrupt needs polling, then we wont get there anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
try_one_irq() contains redundant code and lots of useless checks for
shared interrupts. Check for shared before setting IRQ_INPROGRESS and
then call handle_IRQ_event() while pending. Shorter version with the
same functionality.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We run all handlers with interrupts disabled and expect them not to
enable them. Warn when we catch one who does.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We cannot walk the action chain unlocked. Even if IRQ_INPROGRESS is
set an action can be removed and we follow a null pointer. It's safe
to take the lock there, because the code which removes the action will
call synchronize_irq() which waits unlocked for IRQ_INPROGRESS going
away.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
While rumaging through arch code I found that there are a few
workarounds which deal with the fact that the initial affinity setting
from request_irq() copies the mask into irq_data->affinity before the
chip code is called. In the normal path we unconditionally copy the
mask when the chip code returns 0.
Copy after the code is called and add a return code
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY for the chip functions, which prevents the
copy. That way we see the real mask when the chip function decided to
truncate it further as some arches do. IRQ_SET_MASK_OK is 0, which is
the current behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
If the affinity had been set by the user, then a later request_irq()
will honour that setting. But online cpus can have changed. So apply
the online mask and for this case as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
There is lot of #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ along with
duplicated code in the irq core. Move the #ifdeffery into one place
and cleanup the code so it's readable. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The irq namespace has become quite convoluted. My bad. Clean it up
and deprecate the old functions. All new functions follow the scheme:
irq number based:
irq_set/get/xxx/_xxx(unsigned int irq, ...)
irq_data based:
irq_data_set/get/xxx/_xxx(struct irq_data *d, ....)
irq_desc based:
irq_desc_get_xxx(struct irq_desc *desc)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
chips behind a slow bus cannot update the chip under desc->lock, but
we miss the chip_buslock/chip_bus_sync_unlock() calls around the set
type and set wake functions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We face more and more the requirement to expand nr_irqs at
runtime. The reason are irq expanders which can not be detected in the
early boot stage. So we speculate nr_irqs to have enough room. Further
Xen needs extra irq numbers and we really want to avoid adding more
"detection" code into the early boot. There is no real good reason why
we need to limit nr_irqs at early boot.
Allow the allocation code to expand nr_irqs. We have already 8k extra
number space in the allocation bitmap, so lets use it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Thomas Gleixner