Presently there's an ordering issue with the chained handler change
which places the set_irq_chip() after set_irq_chained_handler(). This
causes a warning to be emitted as the IRQ chip needs to be set first.
However, there is the caveat that redirect IRQs can't use the parent
IRQ's irq chip as they are just dummy redirects, resulting in
intc_enable() blowing up when set_irq_chained_handler() attempts to
start up the redirect IRQ. In these cases we can just use dummy_irq_chip
directly, as we already extract the parent IRQ and chip from the redirect
handler.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Paul Mundt
4d2185d93c