This section mismatch:
>> Seems to be a section mismatch; init_intel() is __cpuinit while
>> numaq_tsc_disable() is __init. Seems to be introduced in:
>>
>> commit 64898a8bad
>> Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat Jul 19 18:01:16 2008 -0700
>>
>> x86: extend and use x86_quirks to clean up NUMAQ code
>
> Oops, I am wrong about numaq_tsc_disable() being __init. Still, I
> believe that Yinghai might be able to say what's really wrong :-)
Would lead to this crash:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c08a45f0
IP: [<c08a45f0>] numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x40
Fixed by the patch below.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so NUMAQ can use that to call numaq_pre_time_init()
This allows us to remove a NUMAQ special from arch/x86/kernel/setup.c.
(and paves the way to remove the NUMAQ subarch)
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
add these new x86_quirks methods:
int *mpc_record;
int (*mpc_apic_id)(struct mpc_config_processor *m);
void (*mpc_oem_bus_info)(struct mpc_config_bus *m, char *name);
void (*mpc_oem_pci_bus)(struct mpc_config_bus *m);
void (*smp_read_mpc_oem)(struct mp_config_oemtable *oemtable,
unsigned short oemsize);
... and move NUMAQ related mps table handling to numaq_32.c.
also move the call to smp_read_mpc_oem() to smp_read_mpc() directly.
Should not change functionality, albeit it would be nice to get it
tested on real NUMAQ as well ...
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
fix:
arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c: In function ‘numaq_tsc_disable’:
arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c:99: warning: ‘return’ with a value, in function returning void
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
got this on a test-system:
calling numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39
NUMAQ: disabling TSC
initcall numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39 returned 0 after 0 msecs
that's because we should not be using arch_initcall to call numaq_tsc_disable.
need to call it in setup_arch before time_init()/tsc_init()
and call it in init_intel() to make the cpu feature bits right.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
... so it could fall back to normal numa and we'd reduce the impact of the
NUMAQ subarch.
NUMAQ depends on GENERICARCH
also decouple genericarch numa from acpi.
also make it fall back to bigsmp if apicid > 8.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
this way 32-bit is more similar to 64-bit, and smarter e820 and numa.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
As part of the i386 conversion to the generic timekeeping infrastructure, this
introduces a new tsc.c file. The code in this file replaces the TSC
initialization, management and access code currently in timer_tsc.c (which
will be removed) that we want to preserve.
The code also introduces the following functionality:
o tsc_khz: like cpu_khz but stores the TSC frequency on systems that do not
change TSC frequency w/ CPU frequency
o check/mark_tsc_unstable: accessor/modifier flag for TSC timekeeping
usability
o minor cleanups to calibration math.
This patch also includes a one line __cpuinitdata fix from Zwane Mwaikambo.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Somewhere recently, the TSC got re-enabled for timekeeping on NUMAQ
machines. However, the hardware makes these get unsynchronized quite
badly. So badly, in fact, that the code to fix up the skew can just hang
on boot.
This patch re-disables them. It's nicely confined to the numaq.c file. It
would be great if this could make it into 2.6.13, I think it counts as a
bugfix.
Tested on a 16-proc 4-node NUMAQ.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Vegard Nossum