It was being open coded in a few places.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Reflect the current status. Portions of the text taken from the
wiki pages.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The data type of max_sectors in queue settings is unsigned int. But
this value is stored to the local variable whose type is unsigned short
in bio_size_ok(). This can cause unexpected result when max_sectors >
0xffff.
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Doing an if statement to test some condition to know if we should
trigger a tracepoint is pointless when tracing is disabled. This just
adds overhead and wastes a branch prediction. This is why the
TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() was created. It places the check inside the jump
label so that the branch does not happen unless tracing is enabled.
That is, instead of doing:
if (em)
trace_btrfs_get_extent(root, em);
Which is basically this:
if (em)
if (static_key(trace_btrfs_get_extent)) {
Using a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() we can just do:
trace_btrfs_get_extent(root, em);
And the condition trace event will do:
if (static_key(trace_btrfs_get_extent)) {
if (em) {
...
The static key is a non conditional jump (or nop) that is faster than
having to check if em is NULL or not.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Commit b02441999e "Btrfs: don't wait for
the completion of all the ordered extents" introduced a bug that broke
the ordered root list:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7119 at lib/list_debug.c:59 __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98()
It is because we forgot to return the roots in the splice list to the
ordered list of the fs. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The page pointer information was useless. The bytenr is what you
want when you search for submitted write bios.
Additionally, a new bit in the print mask is added that allows
to selectively enable the check-int submit_bio verbose mode. Before,
the global verbose mode had to be enabled leading to many million
useless lines in the kernel log.
And a comment is added that explains that LOG_BUF_SHIFT needs to
be set to a really high value.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
These two functions are only stated but undefined.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In btrfs_wait_ordered_range(), if we found an extent to the left
of the start of our desired wait range and the last byte of that
extent is 1 less than the desired range's start, we would would
wait for the IO completion of that extent unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Lockdep complains about btrfs's async commit:
[ 2372.462171] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
[ 2372.462191] 3.12.0+ #32 Tainted: G W
[ 2372.462209] -------------------------------------
[ 2372.462228] ceph-osd/14048 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at:
[ 2372.462275] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462305] but there are no more locks to release!
[ 2372.462324]
[ 2372.462324] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2372.462349] no locks held by ceph-osd/14048.
[ 2372.462367]
[ 2372.462367] stack backtrace:
[ 2372.462386] CPU: 2 PID: 14048 Comm: ceph-osd Tainted: G W 3.12.0+ #32
[ 2372.462414] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080015 11/09/2011
[ 2372.462455] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd28 ffffffff816f094a ffff8800378aa320
[ 2372.462491] ffff88007490fd50 ffffffff810adf4c ffff8800378aa320 ffff88009af97650
[ 2372.462526] ffffffffa022cb10 ffff88007490fd88 ffffffff810b01ee ffff8800898c0000
[ 2372.462562] Call Trace:
[ 2372.462584] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462619] [<ffffffff816f094a>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56
[ 2372.462642] [<ffffffff810adf4c>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xec/0x100
[ 2372.462677] [<ffffffffa022cb10>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1b0/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462710] [<ffffffff810b01ee>] lock_release+0x18e/0x210
[ 2372.462742] [<ffffffffa022cb36>] btrfs_commit_transaction_async+0x1d6/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462783] [<ffffffffa025a7ce>] btrfs_ioctl_start_sync+0x3e/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462822] [<ffffffffa025f1d3>] btrfs_ioctl+0x4c3/0x1f70 [btrfs]
[ 2372.462849] [<ffffffff812c0321>] ? avc_has_perm+0x121/0x1b0
[ 2372.462873] [<ffffffff812c0224>] ? avc_has_perm+0x24/0x1b0
[ 2372.462897] [<ffffffff8107ecc8>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xa8/0x100
[ 2372.462922] [<ffffffff8117b145>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2e5/0x4e0
[ 2372.462946] [<ffffffff812c19e6>] ? file_has_perm+0x86/0xa0
[ 2372.462969] [<ffffffff8117b3c1>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0
[ 2372.462991] [<ffffffff817045a4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
====================================================
It's because that we don't do the right thing when checking if it's ok to
tell lockdep that we're trying to release the rwsem.
If the trans handle's type is TRANS_ATTACH, we won't acquire the freeze rwsem, but
as TRANS_ATTACH fits the check (trans < TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK), we'll release the freeze
rwsem, which makes lockdep complains a lot.
Reported-by: Ma Jianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The 'git blame' history shows that, the old transaction commit code has to do
twice to ensure roots are updated and we have to flush metadata and super block
manually, however, right now all of these can be handled well inside
the transaction commit code without extra efforts.
And the error handling part remains same with the current code, -- 'return to
caller once we get error'.
This saves us a transaction commit and a flush of super block, which are both
heavy operations according to ftrace output analysis.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
__btrfs_start_workers returns 0 in case it raced with
btrfs_stop_workers and lost the race. This is wrong because worker in
this case is not allowed to start and is in fact destroyed. Return
-EINVAL instead.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This disables the "if needed, write the good copy back before the read
is completed" part of the read sequence for read-only mounts.
Cc: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Currently if we discover an error when scrubbing in ro mode we a)
blindly increment the uncorrectable_errors counter, and b) spam the
dmesg with the 'unable to fixup (regular) error at ...' message, even
though a) we haven't tried to determine if the error is correctable or
not, and b) we haven't tried to fixup anything. Fix this.
Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we fsync, seek and write, rename and then fsync again we will lose the
modified hole extent because the rename will drop all of the modified extents
since we didn't do the fast search. We need to only drop the modified extents
if we didn't do the fast search and we were logging the entire inode as we don't
need them anymore, otherwise this is being premature. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we rename a file that is already in the log and we fsync again we will lose
the new name. This is because we just log the inode update and not the new ref.
To fix this we just need to check if we are logging the new name of the inode
and copy all the metadata instead of just updating the inode itself. With this
patch my testcase now passes. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We can just return false for this so we stop doing the snapshot aware defrag
stuff. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Heiko Carstens noticed that btrfs was using empty_zero_page
incorrectly. He explained:
The definition of empty_zero_page is architecture specific. It
is (currently) either a character array, an unsigned long
containing the address of the empty_zero_page, or even worse
only the address of the struct page belonging to the
empty_zero_page.
This commit changes btrfs to use a for-loop instead. On x86
the resulting .ko is smaller, and we're no longer worrying about
how each arch builds its zeros.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
It was very likely that there were lots of async delalloc pages in the
filesystem, if we waited until all the pages were flushed, we would be
blocked for a long time, and the performance would also drop down.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In shrink_delalloc(), what we need reclaim is the metadata space, so
flushing pages by to_reclaim is not reasonable, it is very likely that
the pages we flush are not enough. And then we had to invoke the flush
function for several times, at the worst, we need call flush_space for
several times. It wasted time.
We improve this problem by converting the metadata space size we need
reserve to the delalloc bytes, By this way, we can flush the pages
by a reasonable number.
(Now we use a fixed number to do conversion, it is not flexible, maybe
we can find a good way to improve it in the future.)
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This patch picked up the code that was used to calculate the number of
the items for which we need reserve space, and we will use it in the next
patch.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We only allocate scrub workers if we pass all the necessary
checks, for example, there are no operation in progress.
Besides, move mutex lock protection outside of scrub_workers_get()
/scrub_workers_put().
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I hit this problem with my no holes patch and it made me realize what the
problem was for bz 60834. If the first item in the leaf is an inline extent and
we try to read anything starting from disk_bytenr onward we will read off the
end of the leaf. So we need to check to see what it's type is, and if it's not
REG we can just break out. This should fix this problem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The function write_ctree_super() in disk-io.c uses variable ret to return
the result of function write_all_supers(). Since, this variable serves
no purpose, hence the patch removes it and returns the call of the
called function.
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the
kernel style guidelines.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Replace kmalloc(size * nr, ) with kmalloc_array(nr, size), thus making
it easier to check is that the calculation doesn't wrap or return a smaller allocation
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Enclose macros with complex values within parenthesis in accordance to
checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Remove redundant local zero structure, replacing it by the kernel's
global ZERO_PAGE.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Pack the structure btrfs_device in volumes.h to eliminate holes detected
by pahole, thus reducing binary memory footprint.
Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This patch replaces multiple atomic_inc() with atomic_add() in
delayed-inode.c to reduce source code and have few instructions
for compilation.
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The function free_root_pointers() in disk-io.h contains redundant code.
Therefore, this patch adds a helper function free_root_extent_buffers()
to free_root_pointers() to eliminate redundancy.
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Running balance and defrag concurrently can end up with a crash:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4528!
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01ac33b>] [<ffffffffa01ac33b>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+ 0x1eb/0x230 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa01398c1>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x241/0x380 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0180bad>] ? copy_extent_buffer+0xad/0x110 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0139da1>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x3a1/0x520 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa013a0b6>] btrfs_cow_block+0x116/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa013ddad>] btrfs_search_slot+0x43d/0x970 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0153c57>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0172a5e>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x11e/0xae0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa013b3fd>] ? generic_bin_search.constprop.39+0x8d/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff8117d14a>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1da/0x200
[<ffffffffa0138e7a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0173ef0>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x60/0x90 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa016b24d>] relink_extent_backref+0x2ed/0x780 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0162fe0>] ? btrfs_submit_bio_hook+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa01b8ed7>] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xa0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa016b909>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x229/0xac0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa016c3b5>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa018cbe5>] worker_loop+0x125/0x4e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa018cac0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x300/0x300 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81075ea0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
[<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
[<ffffffff8164796c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It turns out to be that balance operation will bump root's @last_snapshot,
which enables snapshot-aware defrag path, and backref walking stuff will
find data reloc tree as refs' parent, and hit the BUG_ON() during COW.
As data reloc tree's data is just for relocation purpose, and will be deleted right
after relocation is done, it's unnecessary to walk those refs belonged to data reloc
tree, it'd be better to skip them.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If something wrong happens in write endio, running snapshot-aware defragment
can end up with undefined results, maybe a crash, so we should avoid it.
In order to share similar code, this also adds a helper to free the struct for
snapshot-aware defrag.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If we get any error while doing a dir index/item lookup in the
log tree, we were always unlinking the corresponding inode in
the subvolume. It makes sense to unlink only if the lookup failed
to find the dir index/item, which corresponds to NULL or -ENOENT,
and not when other errors happen (like a transient -ENOMEM or -EIO).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We were setting the csums search offset and length to the right values if
the extent is compressed, but later on right before doing the csums lookup
we were overriding these two parameters regardless of compression being
set or not for the extent.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We were ignoring the name component of the dir_item. Both the
name and data must fit within BTRFS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE(root).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Originally, we introduced scrub_super_lock to synchronize
tree log code with scrubbing super.
However we can replace scrub_super_lock with device_list_mutex,
because writing super will hold this mutex, this will reduce an extra
lock holding when writing supers in sync log code.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
After running space balance on a new fs, the fs check program outputed the
following warning message:
free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache generation (20)
Steps to reproduce:
# mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>
# mount <dev> <mnt>
# btrfs balance start <mnt>
# umount <mnt>
# btrfs check <dev>
It was because there was no data space after the space balance, and the free
space write out task didn't try to allocate a new data chunk for the free space
inode when doing the reservation. So the data space reservation failed, and in
order to tell the free space loader that this free space inode could not be
trusted, the generation of the free space inode wasn't updated. Then the check
program found this problem and outputed the above message.
But in fact, it is safe that we try to allocate a new data chunk when we find
the data space is not enough. The patch fixes the above problem by this way.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to
relocate the larger the file system got. This appeared to be because we were
committing the transaction _constantly_. There were a few places where we do
braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then
try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a
transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder
flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction.
We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block
rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we
don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false
so we always committed the transaction in this case. I tested this to make sure
it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this
state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When using delalloc workers in a non-waiting way (like for enospc handling) we
can end up not actually waiting for the dirty pages to be started if we have
compression. We need to add an extra filemap flush to make sure any async
extents that have started are actually moved along before returning. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
A user reported a list corruption warning from btrfs_remove_ordered_extent, it
is because we aren't taking the ordered_root_lock when we remove the inode from
the ordered operations list. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This is just the write path, the only reason we start a transaction is so we can
check cross references, we don't make any actual changes, so there is no reason
to abort the transaction if we fail. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We can just return an error and we'll bail out properly. We still want to catch
this case to make sure we don't have a bug somewhere, so just warn if this pops
up. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Kent Overstreet