It is illegal to use RCU from a CPU that has reported idleness or
offlinedness to RCU. However, it can be quite difficult to determine
from a stack trace whether or not a given CPU is idle or offline.
Therefore, this commit adds idle/offline diagnostics to the lockdep-RCU
error message.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Inform the user if an RCU usage error is detected by lockdep while in
an extended quiescent state (in this case, the RCU-free window in idle).
This is accomplished by adding a line to the RCU lockdep splat indicating
whether or not the splat occurred in extended quiescent state.
Uses of RCU from within extended quiescent state mode are totally ignored
by RCU, hence the importance of this diagnostic.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Since commit f59de89 ("lockdep: Clear whole lockdep_map on initialization"),
lockdep_init_map() will clear all the struct. But it will break
lock_set_class()/lock_set_subclass(). A typical race condition
is like below:
CPU A CPU B
lock_set_subclass(lockA);
lock_set_class(lockA);
lockdep_init_map(lockA);
/* lockA->name is cleared */
memset(lockA);
__lock_acquire(lockA);
/* lockA->class_cache[] is cleared */
register_lock_class(lockA);
look_up_lock_class(lockA);
WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name !=
lock->name);
lock->name = name;
So restore to what we have done before commit f59de89 but annotate
->lock with kmemcheck_mark_initialized() to suppress the kmemcheck
warning reported in commit f59de89.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Suggested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111109080451.GB8124@zhy
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch prints the name of the lock which is acquired
before lockdep_init() is called, so that users can easily
find which lock triggered the lockdep init error warning.
This patch also removes the lockdep_init_error() message
of "Arch code didn't call lockdep_init() early enough?"
since lockdep_init() is called in arch independent code now.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1321508072-23853-2-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Since commit f59de89 ("lockdep: Clear whole lockdep_map on initialization"),
lockdep_init_map() will clear all the struct. But it will break
lock_set_class()/lock_set_subclass(). A typical race condition
is like below:
CPU A CPU B
lock_set_subclass(lockA);
lock_set_class(lockA);
lockdep_init_map(lockA);
/* lockA->name is cleared */
memset(lockA);
__lock_acquire(lockA);
/* lockA->class_cache[] is cleared */
register_lock_class(lockA);
look_up_lock_class(lockA);
WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name !=
lock->name);
lock->name = name;
So restore to what we have done before commit f59de89 but annotate
->lock with kmemcheck_mark_initialized() to suppress the kmemcheck
warning reported in commit f59de89.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Suggested-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111109080451.GB8124@zhy
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Show the taint flags in all lockdep and rtmutex-debug error messages.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1319773015.6759.30.camel@deadeye
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Commit ["62016250 lockdep: Add improved subclass caching"] tries to
improve performance (expecially to reduce the cost of rq->lock)
when using lockdep, but it fails due to lockdep_init_map() in
which ->class_cache is cleared. The typical caller is
lock_set_subclass(), after that class will not be cached anymore.
This patch tries to achive the goal of commit 62016250 by always
setting ->class_cache in register_lock_class().
=== Score comparison of benchmarks ===
for i in `seq 1 10`; do ./perf bench -f simple sched messaging; done
before: min: 0.604, max: 0.660, avg: 0.622
after: min: 0.414, max: 0.473, avg: 0.427
for i in `seq 1 10`; do ./perf bench -f simple sched messaging -g 40; done
before: min: 2.347, max: 2.421, avg: 2.391
after: min: 1.652, max: 1.699, avg: 1.671
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111109080714.GC8124@zhy
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The pretty print of the lockdep debug splat uses just the lock name
to show how the locking scenario happens. But when it comes to
nesting locks, the output becomes confusing which takes away the point
of the pretty printing of the lock scenario.
Without displaying the subclass info, we get the following output:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(slock-AF_INET);
lock(slock-AF_INET);
lock(slock-AF_INET);
lock(slock-AF_INET);
*** DEADLOCK ***
The above looks more of a A->A locking bug than a A->B B->A.
By adding the subclass to the output, we can see what really happened:
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(slock-AF_INET);
lock(slock-AF_INET/1);
lock(slock-AF_INET);
lock(slock-AF_INET/1);
*** DEADLOCK ***
This bug was discovered while tracking down a real bug caught by lockdep.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111025202049.GB25043@hostway.ca
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Long ago, using TREE_RCU with PREEMPT would result in "scheduling
while atomic" diagnostics if you blocked in an RCU read-side critical
section. However, PREEMPT now implies TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, which defeats
this diagnostic. This commit therefore adds a replacement diagnostic
based on PROVE_RCU.
Because rcu_lockdep_assert() and lockdep_rcu_dereference() are now being
used for things that have nothing to do with rcu_dereference(), rename
lockdep_rcu_dereference() to lockdep_rcu_suspicious() and add a third
argument that is a string indicating what is suspicious. This third
argument is passed in from a new third argument to rcu_lockdep_assert().
Update all calls to rcu_lockdep_assert() to add an informative third
argument.
Also, add a pair of rcu_lockdep_assert() calls from within
rcu_note_context_switch(), one complaining if a context switch occurs
in an RCU-bh read-side critical section and another complaining if a
context switch occurs in an RCU-sched read-side critical section.
These are present only if the PROVE_RCU kernel parameter is enabled.
Finally, fix some checkpatch whitespace complaints in lockdep.c.
Again, you must enable PROVE_RCU to see these new diagnostics. But you
are enabling PROVE_RCU to check out new RCU uses in any case, aren't you?
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Andrew requested I comment all the lockdep WARN()s to help other people
figure out wth is wrong..
Requested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315301493.3191.9.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
match_held_lock() was assuming it was being called on a lock class
that had already seen usage.
This condition was true for bug-free code using lockdep_assert_held(),
since you're in fact holding the lock when calling it. However the
assumption fails the moment you assume the assertion can fail, which
is the whole point of having the assertion in the first place.
Anyway, now that there's more lockdep_is_held() users, notably
__rcu_dereference_check(), its much easier to trigger this since we
test for a number of locks and we only need to hold any one of them to
be good.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1312547787.28695.2.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
lockdep_init_map() only initializes parts of lockdep_map and triggers
kmemcheck warning when it is copied as a whole. There isn't anything
to be gained by clearing selectively. memset() the whole structure
and remove loop for ->class_cache[] clearing.
Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35532
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35532
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714131909.GJ3455@htj.dyndns.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 21:06 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> /src/linux/linux/kernel/lockdep.c: In function 'mark_held_locks':
> /src/linux/linux/kernel/lockdep.c:2471:31: warning: comparison of
> distinct pointer types lacks a cast
The warning is harmless in this case, but the below makes it go away.
Reported-by: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1311588599.2617.56.camel@laptop
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Commit dd4e5d3ac4 ("lockdep: Fix trace_[soft,hard]irqs_[on,off]()
recursion") made a bit of a mess of the various checks and error
conditions.
In particular it moved the check for !irqs_disabled() before the
spurious enable test, resulting in some warnings.
Reported-by: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1311679697.24752.28.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Thomas noticed that a lock marked with lockdep_set_novalidate_class()
will still trigger warnings for IRQ inversions. Cure this by skipping
those when marking irq state.
Reported-and-tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2dp5vmpsxeraqm42kgww6ge2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Commit:
1efc5da3cf56: [PATCH] order of lockdep off/on in vprintk() should be changed
explains the reason for having raw_local_irq_*() and lockdep_off()
in printk(). Instead of working around the broken recursion detection
of interrupt state tracking, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110621153806.185242734@chello.nl
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The main lock_is_held() user is lockdep_assert_held(), avoid false
assertions in lockdep_off() sections by unconditionally reporting the
lock is taken.
[ the reason this is important is a lockdep_assert_held() in ttwu()
which triggers a warning under lockdep_off() as in printk() which
can trigger another wakeup and lock up due to spinlock
recursion, as reported and heroically debugged by Arne Jansen ]
Reported-and-tested-by: Arne Jansen <lists@die-jansens.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1307398759.2497.966.camel@laptop
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
For some reason nr_chain_hlocks is updated with cmpxchg, but
this is performed inside of the lockdep global "grab_lock()",
which also makes simple modification of this variable atomic.
Remove the cmpxchg logic for updating nr_chain_hlocks and
simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014300.727863282@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Lockdep output can be pretty cryptic, having nicer output
can save a lot of head scratching. When a simple irq inversion
scenario is detected by lockdep (lock A taken in interrupt
context but also in thread context without disabling interrupts)
we now get the following (hopefully more informative) output:
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(lockA);
<Interrupt>
lock(lockA);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014300.436140880@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The message of "Bad BFS generated tree" is a bit confusing.
Replace it with a more sane error message.
Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for helping me come up with a better
message.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014300.135521252@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Irq inversion and irq dependency bugs are only subtly
different. The diffenerence lies where the interrupt occurred.
For irq dependency:
irq_disable
lock(A)
lock(B)
unlock(B)
unlock(A)
irq_enable
lock(B)
unlock(B)
<interrupt>
lock(A)
The interrupt comes in after it has been established that lock A
can be held when taking an irq unsafe lock. Lockdep detects the
problem when taking lock A in interrupt context.
With the irq_inversion the irq happens before it is established
and lockdep detects the problem with the taking of lock B:
<interrupt>
lock(A)
irq_disable
lock(A)
lock(B)
unlock(B)
unlock(A)
irq_enable
lock(B)
unlock(B)
Since the problem with the locking logic for both of these issues
is in actuality the same, they both should report the same scenario.
This patch implements that and prints this:
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&rq->lock --> lockA --> lockC
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(lockC);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(lockA);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rq->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014259.910720381@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Lockdep output can be pretty cryptic, having nicer output
can save a lot of head scratching. When a simple deadlock
scenario is detected by lockdep (lock A -> lock A) we now
get the following new output:
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(lock)->rlock);
lock(&(lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014259.643930104@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The lockdep output can be pretty cryptic, having nicer output
can save a lot of head scratching. When a normal deadlock
scenario is detected by lockdep (lock A -> lock B and there
exists a place where lock B -> lock A) we now get the following
new output:
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(lockB);
lock(lockA);
lock(lockB);
lock(lockA);
*** DEADLOCK ***
On cases where there's a deeper chair, it shows the partial
chain that can cause the issue:
Chain exists of:
lockC --> lockA --> lockB
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(lockB);
lock(lockA);
lock(lockB);
lock(lockC);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014259.380621789@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Locking order inversion due to interrupts is a subtle problem.
When an irq lockiinversion discovered by lockdep it currently
reports something like:
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
... and then prints out the locks that are involved, as back traces.
Judging by lkml feedback developers were routinely confused by what
a HARDIRQ->safe to unsafe issue is all about, and sometimes even
blew it off as a bug in lockdep.
It is not obvious when lockdep prints this message about a lock that
is never taken in interrupt context.
After explaining the problems that lockdep is reporting, I
decided to add a description of the problem in visual form. Now
the following is shown:
---
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(lockA);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(lockA);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rq->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
---
The above is the case when the unsafe lock is taken while
holding a lock taken in irq context. But when a lock is taken
that also grabs a unsafe lock, the call chain is shown:
---
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&rq->lock --> lockA --> lockC
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(lockC);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(lockA);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rq->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110421014259.132728798@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
During early boot, local IRQ is disabled until IRQ subsystem is
properly initialized. During this time, no one should enable
local IRQ and some operations which usually are not allowed with
IRQ disabled, e.g. operations which might sleep or require
communications with other processors, are allowed.
lockdep tracked this with early_boot_irqs_off/on() callbacks.
As other subsystems need this information too, move it to
init/main.c and make it generally available. While at it,
toggle the boolean to early_boot_irqs_disabled instead of
enabled so that it can be initialized with %false and %true
indicates the exceptional condition.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110120110635.GB6036@htj.dyndns.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Current look_up_lock_class() doesn't check the parameter "subclass".
This rarely rises problems because the main caller of this function,
register_lock_class(), checks it.
But register_lock_class() is not the only function which calls
look_up_lock_class(). lock_set_class() and its callees also call it.
And lock_set_class() doesn't check this parameter.
This will rise problems when the the value of subclass is larger than
MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES. Because the address (used as the key of class)
caliculated with too large subclass has a probability to point
another key in different lock_class_key.
Of course this problem depends on the memory layout and
occurs with really low probability.
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1286958626-986-1-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Current lockdep_map only caches one class with subclass == 0,
and looks up hash table of classes when subclass != 0.
It seems that this has no problem because the case of
subclass != 0 is rare. But locks of struct rq are
acquired with subclass == 1 when task migration is executed.
Task migration is high frequent event, so I modified lockdep
to cache subclasses.
I measured the score of perf bench sched messaging.
This patch has slightly but certain (order of milli seconds
or 10 milli seconds) effect when lots of tasks are running.
I'll show the result in the tail of this description.
NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES specifies how many classes can be
cached in the instances of lockdep_map.
I discussed with Peter Zijlstra in LinuxCon Japan about
this approach and he taught me that caching every subclasses(8)
is cleary waste of memory. So number of cached classes
should be configurable.
=== Score comparison of benchmarks ===
# "min" means best score, and "max" means worst score
for i in `seq 1 10`; do ./perf bench -f simple sched messaging; done
before: min: 0.565000, max: 0.583000, avg: 0.572500
after: min: 0.559000, max: 0.568000, avg: 0.563300
# with more processes
for i in `seq 1 10`; do ./perf bench -f simple sched messaging -g 40; done
before: min: 2.274000, max: 2.298000, avg: 2.286300
after: min: 2.242000, max: 2.270000, avg: 2.259700
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1286269311-28336-2-git-send-email-mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
There is no longer any functional difference between
__debug_show_held_locks() and debug_show_held_locks(),
so remove the former.
Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1281021054-4228-1-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
For people who otherwise get to write: cpu_clock(smp_processor_id()),
there is now: local_clock().
Also, as per suggestion from Andrew, provide some documentation on
the various clock interfaces, and minimize the unsigned long long vs
u64 mess.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
LKML-Reference: <1275052414.1645.52.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The conversion of device->sem to device->mutex resulted in lockdep
warnings. Create a novalidate class for now until the driver folks
come up with separate classes. That way we have at least the basic
mutex debugging coverage.
Add a checkpatch error so the usage is reserved for device->mutex.
[ tglx: checkpatch and compile fix for LOCKDEP=n ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
There is no need to disable lockdep after an RCU lockdep splat,
so remove the debug_lockdeps_off() from lockdep_rcu_dereference().
To avoid repeated lockdep splats, use a static variable in the inlined
rcu_dereference_check() and rcu_dereference_protected() macros so that
a given instance splats only once, but so that multiple instances can
be detected per boot.
This is controlled by a new config variable CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY,
which is disabled by default. This provides the normal lockdep behavior
by default, but permits people who want to find multiple RCU-lockdep
splats per boot to easily do so.
Requested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Drop the nested field as we don't use it. Every nested state can
be computed from a state machine on post processing already.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Drop the waittime field from the lock_acquired event, we can
calculate it by substracting the lock_acquired event timestamp
with the matching lock_acquire one.
It is not needed and takes useless space in the traces.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
When calling check_prevs_add(), if all validations passed
add_lock_to_list() will add new lock to dependency tree and
alloc stack_trace for each list_entry.
But at this time, we are always on the same stack, so stack_trace
for each list_entry has the same value. This is redundant and eats
up lots of memory which could lead to warning on low
MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES.
Use one copy of stack_trace instead.
V2: As suggested by Peter Zijlstra, move save_trace() from
check_prevs_add() to check_prev_add().
Add tracking for trylock dependence which is also redundant.
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@windriver.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100504065711.GC10784@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We forgot to provide a !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP case for the
redundant_hardirqs_on stat handling.
Manage that in the headers with a new __debug_atomic_inc() helper.
Fixes:
kernel/lockdep.c:2306: error: 'lockdep_stats' undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/lockdep.c:2306: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/lockdep.c:2306: error: for each function it appears in.)
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
When a path restore the flags while irqs are already enabled, we
update the per cpu var redundant_hardirqs_on in a racy fashion
and debug_atomic_inc() warns about this situation.
In this particular case, loosing a few hits in a stat is not a big
deal, so increment it without protection.
v2: Don't bother with disabling irq, we can miss one count in
rare situations
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Locking statistics are implemented using global atomic
variables. This is usually fine unless some path write them very
often.
This is the case for the function and function graph tracers
that disable irqs for each entry saved (except if the function
tracer is in preempt disabled only mode).
And calls to local_irq_save/restore() increment
hardirqs_on_events and hardirqs_off_events stats (or similar
stats for redundant versions).
Incrementing these global vars for each function ends up in too
much cache bouncing if lockstats are enabled.
To solve this, implement the debug_atomic_*() operations using
per cpu vars.
-v2: Use per_cpu() instead of get_cpu_var() to fetch the desired
cpu vars on debug_atomic_read()
-v3: Store the stats in a structure. No need for local_t as we
are NMI/irq safe.
-v4: Fix tons of build errors. I thought I had tested it but I
probably forgot to select the relevant config.
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
LKML-Reference: <1270505417-8144-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.
http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
The script does the followings.
* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used,
gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains
core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
doesn't seem to be any matching order.
* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
file.
The conversion was done in the following steps.
1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400
files.
2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion,
some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added
inclusions to around 150 files.
3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h
inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each
slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
necessary.
6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
* x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
* powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
* sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
* ia64 SMP allmodconfig
* s390 SMP allmodconfig
* alpha SMP allmodconfig
* um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
lockdep has custom code to check whether a pointer belongs to static
percpu area which is somewhat broken. Implement proper
is_kernel/module_percpu_address() and replace the custom code.
On UP, percpu variables are regular static variables and can't be
distinguished from them. Always return %false on UP.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
There are rcu locked read side areas in the path where we submit
a trace event. And these rcu_read_(un)lock() trigger lock events,
which create recursive events.
One pair in do_perf_sw_event:
__lock_acquire
|
|--96.11%-- lock_acquire
| |
| |--27.21%-- do_perf_sw_event
| | perf_tp_event
| | |
| | |--49.62%-- ftrace_profile_lock_release
| | | lock_release
| | | |
| | | |--33.85%-- _raw_spin_unlock
Another pair in perf_output_begin/end:
__lock_acquire
|--23.40%-- perf_output_begin
| | __perf_event_overflow
| | perf_swevent_overflow
| | perf_swevent_add
| | perf_swevent_ctx_event
| | do_perf_sw_event
| | perf_tp_event
| | |
| | |--55.37%-- ftrace_profile_lock_acquire
| | | lock_acquire
| | | |
| | | |--37.31%-- _raw_spin_lock
The problem is not that much the trace recursion itself, as we have a
recursion protection already (though it's always wasteful to recurse).
But the trace events are outside the lockdep recursion protection, then
each lockdep event triggers a lock trace, which will trigger two
other lockdep events. Here the recursive lock trace event won't
be taken because of the trace recursion, so the recursion stops there
but lockdep will still analyse these new events:
To sum up, for each lockdep events we have:
lock_*()
|
trace lock_acquire
|
----- rcu_read_lock()
| |
| lock_acquire()
| |
| trace_lock_acquire() (stopped)
| |
| lockdep analyze
|
----- rcu_read_unlock()
|
lock_release
|
trace_lock_release() (stopped)
|
lockdep analyze
And you can repeat the above two times as we have two rcu read side
sections when we submit an event.
This is fixed in this patch by moving the lock trace event under
the lockdep recursion protection.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Lockdep has found the real bug, but the output doesn't look right to me:
> =========================================================
> [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
> 2.6.33-rc5 #77
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> emacs/1609 just changed the state of lock:
> (&(&tty->ctrl_lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<ffffffff8127c648>] tty_fasync+0xe8/0x190
> but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
> (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){-.....}
"HARDIRQ-unsafe" and "this lock took another" looks wrong, afaics.
> ... key at: [<ffffffff81c054a4>] __key.46539+0x0/0x8
> ... acquired at:
> [<ffffffff81089af6>] __lock_acquire+0x1056/0x15a0
> [<ffffffff8108a0df>] lock_acquire+0x9f/0x120
> [<ffffffff81423012>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0x90
> [<ffffffff8127c1be>] __proc_set_tty+0x3e/0x150
> [<ffffffff8127e01d>] tty_open+0x51d/0x5e0
The stack-trace shows that this lock (ctrl_lock) was taken under
->siglock (which is hopefully irq-safe).
This is a clear typo in check_usage_backwards() where we tell the print a
fancy routine we're forwards.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100126181641.GA10460@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Name space cleanup. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Further name space cleanup. No functional change
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
The raw_spin* namespace was taken by lockdep for the architecture
specific implementations. raw_spin_* would be the ideal name space for
the spinlocks which are not converted to sleeping locks in preempt-rt.
Linus suggested to convert the raw_ to arch_ locks and cleanup the
name space instead of using an artifical name like core_spin,
atomic_spin or whatever
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
ia64 found this the hard way (because we currently have a stub
for save_stack_trace() that does nothing). But it would be a
good idea to be cautious in case a real save_stack_trace()
bailed out with an error before it set trace->nr_entries.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: luming.yu@intel.com
LKML-Reference: <4b2024d085302c2a2@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Fix min, max times in /proc/lock_stats
(1) When collecting lock hold and wait times, if the current minimum
time is zero, it will be replaced by the next time.
(2) When aggregating minimum and maximum lock hold and wait times
accross cpus, the values are added, instead of selecting the
minimum and maximum.
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <4B05BBAE.2050005@am.sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Paul E. McKenney