Fix multiple remotely-exploitable stack-based buffer overflows due to
the NCI code pulling length fields directly from incoming frames and
copying too much data into statically-sized arrays.
Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: security@kernel.org
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ilan Elias <ilane@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
llcp_sock_getname() might get called before the LLCP socket was created.
This condition isn't checked, and llcp_sock_getname will simply deref a
NULL ptr in that case.
This exists starting with d646960 ("NFC: Initial LLCP support").
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
That is needed for keeping backward compatibility with apps using the old
netlink polling API (NFC_ATTR_PROTOCOLS instead of NFC_ATTR_IM_PROTOCOLS).
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Sending an RR as a reply to another RR is fine but not quite logical.
We should send RRs only as a reply to I frames.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
When receiving an I or RR frame telling us that some of the pending queues
were not received, we should requeue them before the currently pending ones.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This routine will be called by drivers whenever they receive data in target
mode. This should be unexpected events and as such should be handled by a
standalone API (i.e. not as a callback pointer from an existing API).
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Userspace gets a netlink event upon target mode activation.
The LLCP layer is also signaled when we get an ATR_REQ in order to get
the remote general bytes.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
The MIU extension value can be received during the PAX or during the
connection establishment process. It's definitely a connection related value
rather than a link one.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
RW can only be fetched from a CONNECT or a CC frame thus making it an
end points specific value, not a link one.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
After testing our stack with large SNEP messages, we realized the fragments
were arriving in reversed order.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The NFC core code already does that for them.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The variable 'nfc_genl_family' is only referenced in this file and
should be marked static to prevent it from being exposed globally.
Quites the sparse warning:
warning: symbol 'nfc_genl_family' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The variable 'hci_nfc_ops' is only referenced in this file and
should be marked static to prevent it from being exposed globally.
Quites the sparse warning:
warning: symbol 'hci_nfc_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Pointers should be cleared with NULL, not 0.
Quiets a couple sparse warnings of the type:
warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Include the header to pickup the exported symbol prototype.
Quites the sparse warning:
warning: symbol 'nci_to_errno' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Pointers should be cleared with NULL, not 0.
Quiets a couple sparse warnings of the type:
warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@openbossa.org>
Cc: Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
nfc_llcp_general_bytes is defined in nfc/core.c as:
nfc_llcp_general_bytes(struct nfc_dev *dev, size_t *gb_len).
as in nfc/nfc.h:
nfc_llcp_general_bytes(struct nfc_dev *dev, u8 *gb_len), if CONFIG_NFC_LLCP
is not defined.
so we got some warnings,
net/nfc/core.c:207:2: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘nfc_llcp_general_bytes’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
net/nfc/nfc.h:87:19: note: expected ‘u8 *’ but argument is of type ‘size_t *’
Signed-off-by: joseph daniel <josephdanielwalter@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Otherwise an LLCP send() always returns 0.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Fix the poll mask depending on the socket state. POLLOUT was missing
for example.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Blocking sockets should sleep on a CC (Connection Complete) reception
from the connect() call.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
It is now specified that nfc_target_found() and nfc_target_lost() core
functions must not be called from an atomic context. This allow us to
serialize calls and protect the targets table using the nfc device lock
instead of a spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The NFC Core now caches the active nfc target pointer, thereby avoiding
the need to lookup the target table for each invocation of a driver ops.
Consequently, pn533, HCI and NCI now directly receive an nfc_target
pointer instead of a target index.
Cc: Ilan Elias <ilane@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The SHDLC link layer of HCI based drivers uses CRC-CCITT and thus
needs to select that kernel option.
Otherwise it ends up with this linking error:
net/built-in.o: In function `nfc_shdlc_add_len_crc':
net/nfc/hci/shdlc.c:113: undefined reference to `crc_ccitt'
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Use of "unsigned int" is preferred to bare "unsigned" in net tree.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We were sending the LTO TLV as a version TLV instead of the actual link
timeout one.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
dsap and ssap were swapped when sending DN or DISC.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The if logic could lead to zero length TLVs.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
recv_n is set properly when receiving an HDLC frame.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Some HW/drivers get notifications when a tag moves out of the radio field.
This notification is now forwarded to user space through netlink.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
The target index can be used by userspace to uniquely identify a target
and thus should be kept unique, per NFC adapter. Moreover, some protocols
do not provide a logical index when discovering new targets, so we have to
generate one for them.
For NCI or pn533 to fetch their logical index, we added a logical_idx field
to the target structure.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Most NFC HCI chipsets actually use a simplified HDLC link layer to
carry HCI payloads.
This implementation registers itself as an HCI device on behalf of the
NFC driver.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This is an implementation of ETSI TS 102 622 specification.
Many NFC chipsets use HCI as the host <-> target protocol on top of a
serial link like i2c.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
NFC drivers will call this routine when they detect that a tag leaves the
RF field. This will eventually lead to the corresponding netlink event
to be sent.
Signed-off-by: Eric Lapuyade <eric.lapuyade@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Some chips are capable of detecting when a tag is out of the field, so
they could send a netlink event about it to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Dan Rosenberg