1 Commits (69e97c028b25ef10018d513ead6e7caad276e19f)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Thomas Gleixner	987c75d717	x86_64: move crypto ... Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>	18 years ago
Thomas Gleixner	e4bd76e1c5	x86_64: prepare shared crypto/twofish-x86_64-asm.S ... Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>	18 years ago
Joachim Fritschi	eaf44088ff	[CRYPTO] twofish: x86-64 assembly version ... The patch passed the trycpt tests and automated filesystem tests. This rewrite resulted in some nice perfomance increase over my last patch. Short summary of the tcrypt benchmarks: Twofish Assembler vs. Twofish C (256bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: -27% Cycles decrypt: -23% Cycles Twofish Assembler vs. AES Assembler (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: +18% Cycles decrypt: +15% Cycles Twofish Assembler vs. AES Assembler (256bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: -9% Cycles decrypt: -8% Cycles Full Output: http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-twofish-c-x86_64.txt http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-twofish-asm-x86_64.txt http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-aes-asm-x86_64.txt Here is another bonnie++ benchmark with encrypted filesystems. Most runs maxed out the hd. It should give some idea what the module can do for encrypted filesystem performance even though you can't see the full numbers. http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/output_20060610_130806_x86_64.html Signed-off-by: Joachim Fritschi <jfritschi@freenet.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>	19 years ago
Joachim Fritschi	b9f535ffe3	[CRYPTO] twofish: i586 assembly version ... The patch passed the trycpt tests and automated filesystem tests. This rewrite resulted in some nice perfomance increase over my last patch. Short summary of the tcrypt benchmarks: Twofish Assembler vs. Twofish C (256bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: -33% Cycles decrypt: -45% Cycles Twofish Assembler vs. AES Assembler (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: +3% Cycles decrypt: -22% Cycles Twofish Assembler vs. AES Assembler (256bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: -20% Cycles decrypt: -36% Cycles Full Output: http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-twofish-asm-i586.txt http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-twofish-c-i586.txt http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/tcrypt-speed-aes-asm-i586.txt Here is another bonnie++ benchmark with encrypted filesystems. All runs with the twofish assembler modules max out the drivespeed. It should give some idea what the module can do for encrypted filesystem performance even though you can't see the full numbers. http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~fritschi/twofish/output_20060611_205432_x86.html Signed-off-by: Joachim Fritschi <jfritschi@freenet.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>	19 years ago