- Use #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
- Remove "microcode: " prefix from each pr_<level>
- Fix duplicated KERN_ERR prefix
- Coalesce pr_<level> format strings
- Add a space after an exclamation point
No other change in output.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1260340250.27677.191.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
There is no point in warning when there is no ucode available
for a specific CPU revision. Currently the container-file, which
provides the AMD ucode patches for OS load, contains only a few
ucode patches.
It's already clearly indicated by the printed patch_level
whenever new ucode was available and an update happened. So the
warning message is of no help but rather annoying on systems
with many CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091110110825.GI30802@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This also implies that corresponding log messages, e.g.
platform microcode: firmware: requesting amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin
show up only once on module load and not when ucode is updated
for each CPU.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: dimm <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091110110723.GH30802@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
vfree() does its own 'NULL' check, so no need for check before
calling it.
In v2, remove the stray newline.
[ Impact: cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1244385036.3402.11.camel@myhost>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* Solve issues described in 6f66cbc630
in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed();
* in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks
must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other.
smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run
these callbacks on a target cpu.
* cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part
The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu
(be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT)
is being updated at any particular moment of time.
In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in
arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks).
See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c.
* return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in
microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions
for an error code?
* use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user}
to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases
and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an
error per-se).
* some minor cleanups
Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing!
Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2
[ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth>
[ did some more cleanups ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++----
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++-------
4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-)
(~20 new comment lines)
this warning:
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c: In function ‘apply_microcode_amd’:
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:163: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:163: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
triggers because we want to pass the address to the microcode MSR,
which is 64-bit even on 32-bit. Cast it explicitly to express this.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: remove dead/incorrect code
Currently there is no chipset specific ucode. The checks are incorrect
anyway (e.g. pci device IDs are 16 bit and not 8 bit).
Thus I remove the stuff for the time being and will reintroduce it if
it's foreseeable that it is really needed.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: fix build warning
CC arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.o
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c: In function ‘request_microcode_fw’:
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:393: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘generic_load_microcode’ discards qualifiers from pointer target type
(Respect "const" qualifier of firmware->data.)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Impact: fix bug resulting in non-loaded AMD microcode
mc_header->processor_rev_id is a 2 byte value. Similar is true for
equiv_cpu in an equiv_cpu_entry -- only 2 bytes are of interest.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
(1) mark mc_size in generic_load_microcode() as unitialized_var to avoid
gcc's (false) warning;
(2) mark request_microcode_user() as unsupported. The required changes
can be added later. Note, we don't break any user-space interfaces
here, as there were no kernels with support for AMD-specific ucode
update yet. The ucode has to be updated via 'firmware'.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Renaming based on patch from Dmitry Adamushko.
Further clarification by renaming define and variable related to
microcode container file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Renaming based on patch from Dmitry Adamushko.
Made code more readable by renaming define and variables related
to microcode _container_file_ header to make it distinguishable from
microcode _patch_ header.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Combine both generic and arch-specific parts of microcode into a
single module (arch-specific parts are config-dependent).
Also while we are at it, move arch-specific parts from microcode.h
into their respective arch-specific .c files.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Cc: "Peter Oruba" <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
this is a rework of the microcode splitup in tip/x86/microcode
(1) I think this new interface is cleaner (look at the changes
in 'struct microcode_ops' in microcode.h);
(2) it's -64 lines of code;
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
microcode_amd.c uses ">> 32" on a 32-bit value, so gcc warns about that.
The code could use something like this *untested* patch.
linux-next-20080821/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c:229: warning: right shift count >= width of type
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This is the 1st patch in the series. Here the aim was to avoid any
significant changes, logically-wise.
So it's mainly about generic interface refactoring: e.g. make
microcode_{intel,amd}.c more about arch-specific details and less
about policies like make-sure-we-run-on-a-target-cpu
(no more set_cpus_allowed_ptr() here) and generic synchronization (no
more microcode_mutex here).
All in all, more line have been deleted than added.
4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Don't use get_cpu() at all. Resort to checking a boot-up CPU (#0) in
microcode_{intel,amd}_module_init().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch introduces microcode patch loading for AMD
processors. It is based on previous corresponding work
for Intel processors.
It hooks into the general patch loading module. Main
difference is that a container file format is used to hold
all patch data for multiple processors as well as an
equivalent CPU table, which comes seperately, as opposed
to Intel's microcode patching solution.
Kconfig and Makefile have been changed provice config
and build option for new source file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Joe Perches