memory_setup is overridden by x86_quirks and by paravirts with weak
functions and quirks. Unify the whole mess and make it an
unconditional x86_init_ops function which defaults to the standard
function and can be overridden by the early platform code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Impact: cleanup
This fixed various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c:
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident>
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident>
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident>
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: got unsigned int [toplevel] *<noident>
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
fix the following 'make headers_check' warning:
usr/include/asm/e820.h:44: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:
a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
so could let BAR res register at first, or even pnp.
v2: insert e820 reserve resources before pnp_system_init
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Add support for the E820_UNUSABLE memory type, which is defined in
Revision 3.0b (Oct. 10, 2006) of the ACPI Specification on p. 394 Table
14-1:
AddressRangeUnusuable This range of address contains memory in which
errors have been detected. This range must not be used by the OSPM.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch is the result of an automatic script that consolidates the
format of all the headers in include/asm-x86/.
The format:
1. No leading underscore. Names with leading underscores are reserved.
2. Pathname components are separated by two underscores. So we can
distinguish between mm_types.h and mm/types.h.
3. Everything except letters and numbers are turned into single
underscores.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
it's separate functionality that deserves its own file.
This also prepares 32-bit memtest support.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
asm-x86/e820.h is included from userspace. 'x86: make e820.c to have
common functions' (b79cd8f126) broke it:
make -C Documentation/lguest
cc -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -O3 -I../../include
lguest.c -lz -o lguest
In file included from ../../include/asm-x86/bootparam.h:8,
from lguest.c:45:
../../include/asm/e820.h:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘start’
../../include/asm/e820.h:67: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘start’
../../include/asm/e820.h:68: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘start’
../../include/asm/e820.h:72: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’
or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e820_update_range’
...
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
when more than 4g memory is installed, don't map the big hole below 4g.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
When system have 4g less ram installed, and acpi table sit
near end of ram, make max_pfn cover them too,
so 64bit kernel don't need to mess up fixmap.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch uses the /sys/firmware/memmap interface provided in the last patch
on the x86 architecture when E820 is used. The patch copies the E820
memory map very early, and registers the E820 map afterwards via
firmware_map_add_early().
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: yhlu.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
so it has a more meaningful name.
also change it to static.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
e820_search_gap also take a end_addr parameter to limit search from
start_addr to end_addr.
Signed-off-by: AloK N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Ying Huang would like setup_data to be reserved, but not included in the
no save range.
Here we try to modify the e820 table to reserve that range early.
also add that in early_res in case bootloader messes up with the ramdisk.
other solution would be
1. add early_res_to_highmem...
2. early_res_to_e820...
but they could reserve another type memory wrongly, if early_res has some
resource reserved early, and not needed later, but it is not removed from
early_res in time. Like the RAMDISK (already handled).
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org
Tested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This is a preparatory patch for the next patch in series.
Moves some code from e820_setup_gap to a new function e820_search_gap.
This patch is a part of a bug fix where we walk the ACPI table to calculate
a gap for PCI optional devices.
v1->v2: Patch on top of tip/master.
Fixes a bug introduced in the last patch about the typeof "last".
Also the new function e820_search_gap now returns if we found a gap in
e820_map.
Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Add support for overlapping early memory reservations.
In general, they still can't overlap, and will panic
with "Overlapping early reservations" if they do overlap.
But if a memory range is reserved with the new call:
reserve_early_overlap_ok()
rather than with the usual call:
reserve_early()
then subsequent early reservations are allowed to overlap.
This new reserve_early_overlap_ok() call is only used in one
place so far, which is the "BIOS reserved" reservation for the
the EBDA region, which out of Paranoia reserves more than what
the BIOS might have specified, and which thus might overlap with
another legitimate early memory reservation (such as, perhaps,
the EFI memmap.)
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: "Huang
Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
... so could add real hole in e820
agp check is using request_mem_region, and could fail if e820 is reserved...
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
1. let 64bit support 88 and e801 too
2. introduce default_machine_specific_memory_setup, and reuse it
for voyager
v2: fix 64 bit compiling
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
and make 32-bit resource registration more like 64 bit.
also move probe_roms back to setup_32.c
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Because of the size limits of struct boot_params (zero page), the
maximum number of E820 memory map entries can be passed to kernel is
128. As pointed by Paul Jackson, there is some machine produced by SGI
with so many nodes that the number of E820 memory map entries is more
than 128. To enabling Linux kernel on these system, a new setup data
type named SETUP_E820_EXT is defined to pass additional memory map
entries to Linux kernel.
This patch is based on x86/auto-latest branch of git-x86 tree and has
been tested on x86_64 and i386 platform.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
use early_node_map to init high pages, so we can remove page_is_ram() and
page_is_reserved_early() in the big loop with add_one_highpage
also remove page_is_reserved_early(), it is not needed anymore.
v2: fix the build of other platforms
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
rename update_memory_range to e820_update_range
rename add_memory_region to e820_add_region
to make it more clear that they are about e820 map operations.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
since we now have 32-bit support for e820_register_active_regions(),
we can merge the parsing of the mem=/memmap= boot parameters.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch makes early reserved highmem pages become reserved
pages. This can be used for highmem pages allocated by bootloader such
as EFI memory map, linked list of setup_data, etc.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
make mptable to be consistent with acpi routing, so we could:
1. kexec kernel with acpi=off
2. work around BIOSes where acpi routing is working, but mptable is
not right, so can use kernel/kexec to start other OSes that don't have
good acpi support.
command line: update_mptable
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
and make e820_mark_nosave_regions to take limit_pfn to use max_low_pfn
for 32bit and end_pfn for 64bit
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The map size counter passed into, and back out of, sanitize_e820_map(),
was an eight bit type (char or u8), as derived from its origins in
legacy BIOS E820 structures. This patch changes that type to an 'int',
to allow this sanitize routine to also be used on larger maps (larger
than the 256 count that fits in a char). The legacy BIOS E820 interface
of course does not change; that remains at 8 bits for this count, holding
up to E820MAX == 128 entries. But the kernel internals can handle more
when those additional memory map entries are passed from the BIOS via
EFI interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Extend internal boot time memory tables to allow for up to
three entries per node, which may be larger than the 128 E820MAX
entries handled by the legacy BIOS E820 interface. The EFI
interface, if present, is capable of passing memory map
entries for these larger node counts.
This patch requires an earlier patch that rewrote code depending
on these array sizes from using E820MAX explicitly to size loops,
to instead using ARRAY_SIZE() of the applicable array.
Another patch following this one will provide the code to pick
up additional memory entries passed via the EFI interface from
the BIOS and insert them in the following, now enlarged, arrays.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This patch is motivated by a subsequent patch which will allow for more
memory map entries on EFI supported systems than can be passed via the x86
legacy BIOS E820 interface. The legacy interface is limited to E820MAX ==
128 memory entries, and that "E820MAX" manifest constant was used as the
size for several arrays and loops over those arrays.
The primary change in this patch is to change code loop sizes over those
arrays from using the constant E820MAX, to using the ARRAY_SIZE() macro
evaluated for the array being looped. That way, a subsequent patch can
change the size of some of these arrays, without breaking this code.
This patch also adds a parameter to the sanitize_e820_map() routine,
which had an implicit size for the array passed it of E820MAX entries.
This new parameter explicitly passes the size of said array. Once again,
this will allow a subsequent patch to change that array size for some
calls to sanitize_e820_map() without breaking the code.
As part of enhancing the sanitize_e820_map() interface this way, I further
combined the unnecessarily distinct x86_32 and x86_64 declarations for
this routine into a single, commonly used, declaration.
This patch in itself should make no difference to the resulting kernel
binary.
[ mingo@elte.hu: merged to -tip ]
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
page_is_ram has a FIXME since ages, which reminds to sanity check the
BIOS area between 640k and 1M, which is sometimes falsely reported as
RAM in the e820 tables.
Implement the sanity check. Move the BIOS range defines from
pageattr.c into e820.h to avoid duplicate defines.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To actually write a bootloader (or, say, the lguest launcher)
currently requires duplication of these structures. Making them
includable from userspace is much nicer.
We merge the common userspace-required definitions of e820_32/64.h
into e820.h for export.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Move the headers to include/asm-x86 and fixup the
header install make rules
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Thomas Gleixner