RFC 3530 states that for OPEN_DOWNGRADE "The share_access and share_deny
bits specified must be exactly equal to the union of the share_access and
share_deny bits specified for some subset of the OPENs in effect for
current openowner on the current file.
Setattr is currently violating the NFSv4 rules for OPEN_DOWNGRADE in that
it may cause a downgrade from OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH to
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE despite the fact that there exists no open file
with O_WRONLY access mode.
Fix the problem by replacing nfs4_find_state() with a modified version of
nfs_find_open_context().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
We must not remove the nfs4_state structure from the inode open lists
before we are in sequence lock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Storing a pointer to the struct rpc_task in the nfs_seqid is broken
since the nfs_seqid may be freed well after the task has been destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
We no longer need to worry about collisions between close() and the state
recovery code, since the new close will automatically recheck the
file state once it is done waiting on its sequence slot.
Ditto for the nfs4_proc_locku() procedure.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Once the state_owner and lock_owner semaphores get removed, it will be
possible for other OPEN requests to reopen the same file if they have
lower sequence ids than our CLOSE call.
This patch ensures that we recheck the file state once
nfs_wait_on_sequence() has completed waiting.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
NFSv4 file state-changing functions such as OPEN, CLOSE, LOCK,... are all
labelled with "sequence identifiers" in order to prevent the server from
reordering RPC requests, as this could cause its file state to
become out of sync with the client.
Currently the NFS client code enforces this ordering locally using
semaphores to restrict access to structures until the RPC call is done.
This, of course, only works with synchronous RPC calls, since the
user process must first grab the semaphore.
By dropping semaphores, and instead teaching the RPC engine to hold
the RPC calls until they are ready to be sent, we can extend this
process to work nicely with asynchronous RPC calls too.
This patch adds a new list called "rpc_sequence" that defines the order
of the RPC calls to be sent. We add one such list for each state_owner.
When an RPC call is ready to be sent, it checks if it is top of the
rpc_sequence list. If so, it proceeds. If not, it goes back to sleep,
and loops until it hits top of the list.
Once the RPC call has completed, it can then bump the sequence id counter,
and remove itself from the rpc_sequence list, and then wake up the next
sleeper.
Note that the state_owner sequence ids and lock_owner sequence ids are
all indexed to the same rpc_sequence list, so OPEN, LOCK,... requests
are all ordered w.r.t. each other.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Currently we return -ENOMEM for every single failure to create a new auth.
This is actually accurate for auth_null and auth_unix, but for auth_gss it's a
bit confusing.
Allow rpcauth_create (and the ->create methods) to return errors. With this
patch, the user may sometimes see an EINVAL instead. Whee.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Trond Myklebust