CARDBUS_MEM_SIZE was increased to 64MB on 2.6.20-rc2, but larger size might
result in allocation failure for the reserving itself on some platforms
(for example typical 32bit MIPS). Make it (and CARDBUS_IO_SIZE too)
customizable by "pci=" option for such platforms.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Linus sayeth:
Google knows everything, and finds, on MS own site no less:
"Windows 2000 default resources:
One 4K memory window
One 2 MB memory window
Two 256-byte I/O windows"
which is clearly utterly bogus and insufficient. But Microsoft apparently
realized this, and:
"Windows XP default resources:
Because one memory window of 4K and one window of 2 MB are not
sufficient for CardBus controllers in many configurations, Windows XP
allocates larger memory windows to CardBus controllers where possible.
However, resource windows are static (that is, the operating system
does not dynamically allocate larger memory windows if new devices
appear.) Under Windows XP, CardBus controllers will be assigned the
following resources:
One 4K memory window, as in Windows 2000
64 MB memory, if that amount of memory is available. If 64 MB is not
available the controller will receive 32 MB; if 32 MB is not available,
the controller will receive 16 MB; if 16 MB is not available, the
bridge will receive 8 MB; and so on down to a minimum assignment of 1
MB in configurations where memory is too constrained for the operating
system to provide a larger window.
Two 256-byte I/O windows"
So I think we have our answer. Windows uses one 4k window, and one 64MB
window. And they are no more dynamic than we are (we _could_ try to do it
dynamically, but let's face it, it's fairly painful to dynamically expand
PCI bus resources - you may need to reprogram everything up to the root,
so it would be absolutely crazy to do that unless you have some serious
masochistic tendencies).
So let's just increase our default value to 64M too.
Cc: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@gmx.ch>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Roland Dreier wrote:
> The change "PCI: assign ioapic resource at hotplug" (commit
> 2318627965 in Linus's tree) makes
> networking stop working on my system (SuperMicro H8QC8 with four
> dual-core Opteron 885 CPUs). In particular, the on-board NIC stops
> working, probably because it gets assigned the wrong IRQ (225 in the
> non-working case, 217 in the working case)
>
> With that patch applied, e1000 doesn't work. Reverting just that
> patch (shown below) from Linus's latest tree fixes things for me.
>
The cause of this problem might be an wrong assumption that the 'start'
member of resource structure for ioapic device has non-zero value if the
resources are assigned by firmware. The 'start' member of ioapic device
seems not to be set even though the resources were actually assigned to
ioapic devices by firmware.
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
We need to assign resources to ioapics being hot-added. This patch
changes pbus_assign_resources_sorted() to assign resources if the
ioapic has no assigned resources.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This is needed if we wish to change the size of the resource structures.
Based on an original patch from Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
A recent Stratus x86_64 platform uses a system ioapic that is a PCI device
located below a PCI bridge. Other platforms like this may exist.
This patch fixes a problem wherein the kernel's PCI setup code moves
the ioapic to an address other than that assigned by the BIOS. It simply
adds another exclusion (which already includes classless devices and host
bridges) to the function pbus_assign_resources_sorted so that it will not
move the ioapic.
If the ioapic is moved, the fixmap mapping to it is broken, so the OS should
leave it alone.
From: Kimball Murray <kimball.murray@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
That's what we've always historically done, and bigger windows seem to
confuse some cardbus bridges. Or something.
Alan reports that this makes the ThinkPad 600x series work properly
again: the 4kB IO window for some reason made IDE DMA not work, which
makes IDE painfully slow even if it works after DMA timeouts.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Share code between setup-bus.c and yenta_socket.c: use the write-out code of
resources to the bridge also in yenta_socket.c, as it provides useful debug
output. In addition, it fixes the bug that the CPU-centric resource view
might need to be transferred to the PCI-centric view: setup-bus.c does that,
while yenta-socket.c did not.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
I had some time to think about PCI assign issues in 2.6.13-rc series.
The major problem here is that we call pci_assign_unassigned_resources()
way too early - at subsys_initcall level. Therefore we give no chances
to ACPI and PnP routines (called at fs_initcall level) to reserve their
respective resources properly, as the comments in drivers/pnp/system.c
and drivers/acpi/motherboard.c suggest:
/**
* Reserve motherboard resources after PCI claim BARs,
* but before PCI assign resources for uninitialized PCI devices
*/
So I moved the pci_assign_unassigned_resources() call to
pcibios_assign_resources() (fs_initcall), which should hopefully fix a
lot of problems and make PCIBIOS_MIN_IO tweaks unnecessary.
Other changes:
- remove resource assignment code from pcibios_assign_resources(), since
it duplicates pci_assign_unassigned_resources() functionality and
actually does nothing in 2.6.13;
- modify ROM assignment code as per Ben's suggestion: try to use firmware
settings by default (if PCI_ASSIGN_ROMS is not set);
- set CARDBUS_IO_SIZE back to 4K as it's a wonderful stress test for
various setups.
Confirmed by Tero Roponen <teanropo@cc.jyu.fi> (who had problems with
the 4kB CardBus IO size previously).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
It may seem small, but most cards need much less, if any, and this not
only makes the code adhere to the comment, it seems to fix a boot-time
lockup on a ThinkPad 380XD laptop reported by Tero Roponen <teanropo@cc.jyu.fi>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
The setup-bus code doesn't work correctly for configurations
with more than one display adapter in the same PCI domain.
This stuff actually is a leftover of an early 2.4 PCI setup code
and apparently it stopped working after some "bridge_ctl" changes.
So the best thing we can do is just to remove it and rely on the fact
that any firmware *has* to configure VGA port forwarding for the boot
display device properly.
But then we need to ensure that the bus->bridge_ctl will always
contain valid information collected at the probe time, therefore
the following change in pci_scan_bridge() is needed.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
There is a slight disagreement between setup-bus.c code and traditional
x86 PCI setup wrt which recourses are invalid vs resources that are free
for further allocations.
In particular, in the setup-bus.c, if we failed to allocate some resource,
we nullify "start" and "flags" fields, but *not* the "end" one.
But x86 pcibios_enable_resources() does the following check:
if (!r->start && r->end) {
printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: Device %s not available because of resource collisions\n", pci_name(dev));
return -EINVAL;
which means that the device owning the offending resource cannot be
enabled.
In particular, this breaks cardbus behind the normal decode p2p bridge -
the cardbus code from setup-bus.c requests rather large IO and MEM
windows, and if it fails, the socket is completely unavailable. Which
is wrong, as the yenta code is capable to allocate smaller windows.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Add sanity check for io[port,mem]_resource in setup-bus.c. These
resources look like "free" as they have no parents, but obviously
we must not touch them.
- In i386.c:pci_allocate_bus_resources(), if a bridge resource cannot be
allocated for some reason, then clear its flags. This prevents any child
allocations in this range, so the setup-bus code will work with a clean
resource sub-tree.
- i386.c:pcibios_enable_resources() doesn't enable bridges, as it checks
only resources 0-5, which looks like a clear bug to me. I suspect it
might break hotplug as well in some cases.
From: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
When hot-plugging an I/O hierarchy that contains many bridges and leaf
devices, it's possible that there are not enough resources to start all the
device present. If we fail to assign a resource, clear the corresponding
value in the pci_dev structure, so other code can take corrective action.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Atsushi Nemoto