The existing asm-generic/atomic.h only defines the
atomic_long type. This renames it to atomic-long.h
so we have a place to add a truly generic atomic.h
that can be used on all non-SMP systems.
Signed-off-by: Remis Lima Baima <remis.developer@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This fixes up a typo in the ll/sc based cmpxchg code which apparently
wasn't getting a lot of testing due to the swapped old/new pair. With
that fixed up, the ll/sc code also starts using it and provides its own
atomic_add_unless().
Signed-off-by: Aoi Shinkai <shinkoi2005@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
The atomic_t type cannot currently be used in some header files because it
would create an include loop with asm/atomic.h. Move the type definition
to linux/types.h to break the loop.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This follows the sparc changes a439fe51a1.
Most of the moving about was done with Sam's directions at:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=121724823706062&w=2
with subsequent hacking and fixups entirely my fault.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
This implements kernel-level atomic rollback built on top of gUSA,
as an alternative non-IRQ based atomicity method. This is generally
a faster method for platforms that are lacking the LL/SC pairs that
SH-4A and later use, and is only supportable on legacy cores.
Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
We have a few different ways to do the atomic operations, so split
them out in to different headers rather than bloating atomic.h.
Kernelspace gUSA will take this up to a third implementation.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
gcc4 gets a bit pissy about the outputs:
include/asm/atomic.h: In function 'atomic_add':
include/asm/atomic.h:37: error: invalid lvalue in asm statement
include/asm/atomic.h:30: error: invalid lvalue in asm output 1
...
this ended up being a thinko anyways, so just fix it up.
Verified for proper behaviour with the older toolchains, too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
We had quite a bit of whitespace damage, clean most of it up..
Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Othieno <a.othieno@bluewin.ch>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
add atomic_xchg() to all the architectures. Needed by the new mutex code.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Several counters already have the need to use 64 atomic variables on 64 bit
platforms (see mm_counter_t in sched.h). We have to do ugly ifdefs to fall
back to 32 bit atomic on 32 bit platforms.
The VM statistics patch that I am working on will also make more extensive
use of atomic64.
This patch introduces a new type atomic_long_t by providing definitions in
asm-generic/atomic.h that works similar to the c "long" type. Its 32 bits
on 32 bit platforms and 64 bits on 64 bit platforms.
Also cleans up the determination of the mm_counter_t in sched.h.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Introduce an atomic_inc_not_zero operation. Make this a special case of
atomic_add_unless because lockless pagecache actually wants
atomic_inc_not_negativeone due to its offset refcount.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
Paul Mundt