Wistron MS 2111 (aka Medion 'Titanium' MD 9783, aka ALDI PC,
aka Fujitsu-Siemens AMILO D7800, aka ...) has 5 extra buttons,
map them. Unfortunately we only have DMI data for the Medion
box.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
offset can never be < 0 because it has type size_t. The driver
currently oopses on insmod if BIOS does not support the interface,
instead of refusing to load.
Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmac <mitr@volny.cz>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Do not use platform_device_register_simple() as it is going away,
implement ->probe() and ->remove() functions so manual binding and
unbinding would work.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Try to save battery power by disabling wifi and bluetooth on suspend.
Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmac <mitr@volny.cz>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Also fix a potential issue with some notebooks:
The current code assumes the response to bios_wifi_get_default_setting is
either 1 (disabled) or 3 (enabled), or wifi isn't supported. The BIOS
response appears to be a bit field w/ 0x1 indicating hardware presence, 0x2
indicating actiation status, and the other 6 bits being unknown/reserved --
with the patch, these 6 bits are ignored.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero@arklinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
A driver for laptop buttons using an x86 BIOS interface that is
apparently used on quite a few laptops and seems to be originating
from Wistron.
This driver currently "knows" only about Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pro V2000
(i.e. it can detect the laptop using DMI and it contains the
keycode->key meaning mapping for this laptop) and Xeron SonicPro X 155G
(probably can't be reliably autodetected, requires a module parameter),
adding other laptops should be easy.
In addition to reporting button presses to the input layer the driver
also allows enabling/disabling the embedded wireless NIC (using the
"Wifi" button); this is done using the same BIOS interface, so it seems
only logical to keep the implementation together. Any flexibility
possibly gained by allowing users to remap the function of the "Wifi"
button is IMHO not worth it when weighted against the necessity to run
an user-space daemon to convert button presses to wifi state changes.
Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmac <mitr@volny.cz>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Frank de Lange