drm/radeon: gcc fixes for sumo dpm

Newer versions of gcc seem to wander off into the
weeds when dealing with variable sizes arrays in
structs.  Rather than indexing the arrays, use
pointer arithmetic.

See bugs:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66932
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66972
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66945

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
tirimbino
Alex Deucher 12 years ago
parent bdcc031bc7
commit d5222ae7ad
  1. 8
      drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/sumo_dpm.c

@ -1483,6 +1483,7 @@ static int sumo_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->pm.dpm.backbias_response_time = le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usBackbiasTime);
rdev->pm.dpm.voltage_response_time = le16_to_cpu(power_info->pplib.usVoltageTime);
for (i = 0; i < state_array->ucNumEntries; i++) {
u8 *idx;
power_state = (union pplib_power_state *)power_state_offset;
non_clock_array_index = power_state->v2.nonClockInfoIndex;
non_clock_info = (struct _ATOM_PPLIB_NONCLOCK_INFO *)
@ -1496,12 +1497,15 @@ static int sumo_parse_power_table(struct radeon_device *rdev)
}
rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i].ps_priv = ps;
k = 0;
idx = (u8 *)&power_state->v2.clockInfoIndex[0];
for (j = 0; j < power_state->v2.ucNumDPMLevels; j++) {
clock_array_index = power_state->v2.clockInfoIndex[j];
clock_array_index = idx[j];
if (k >= SUMO_MAX_HARDWARE_POWERLEVELS)
break;
clock_info = (union pplib_clock_info *)
&clock_info_array->clockInfo[clock_array_index * clock_info_array->ucEntrySize];
((u8 *)&clock_info_array->clockInfo[0] +
(clock_array_index * clock_info_array->ucEntrySize));
sumo_parse_pplib_clock_info(rdev,
&rdev->pm.dpm.ps[i], k,
clock_info);

Loading…
Cancel
Save